|
Flat Panels
Video Projectors Rear-Projection TV Receivers Speakers Disc Players Surround Pre/Pros Amplifiers Accessories Recently Added
Video Displays
Speakers
Sources
Electronics
Accessories Scott Wilkinson Thomas Norton Fred Manteghian Kim Wilson How To Features Audio/Video News Past eNewsletters CEDIA 2008 CES 2008 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 CES 2007 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 CES 2006 Thomas J. Norton Michael Fremer Joel Brinkley Scott Wilkinson AV Links Contact Us Flatscreen TVs LCD TVs Plasma TVs HDTV AV Receivers Home Theater in a Box Digital Projectors DLP Projectors Video Projectors Surround Sound Dolby 5.1 |
Bryston Powerpack 300 Power Amplifier:
Five is Better It was a simple task to install the Powerpack 300s in each of my two home theater rooms. In my large room, one Powerpack 300 replaced each of the five Bel Canto EVO 2 amplifiers. Except for adjusting the relative subwoofer level, the installation required no other changes or re-calibrations. In my small room, I replaced the Pass X-150 driving the front three channels with three Powerpack 300s. Two more Powerpacks replaced the rear amplifier, an Edge Electronics AV-3. This system also employed a Lexicon MC-12 V.4 pre-pro with built-in room EQ. In both systems, I used balanced XLR inputs for the front three channels and unbalanced RCA inputs for the two rear channels.
The Bryston Sound
As you might expect given its output rating, the Powerpack 300 amplifier has prodigious amounts of power and seemingly unlimited dynamic ability. Unlike its smaller sibling, the Powerpack 120, the 300 never exhibited any strain, even when driving the difficult impedance load presented by the Genesis 6.1 loudspeaker system. The Powerpack 300s' sound not only did not change during dynamic peaks, but exhibited exemplary dynamic contrast and control even at moderate levels. During some movies, such as Pearl Harbor, I found it necessary to turn up the sound during the dialog sections and back down during the explosive action scenes because the dynamic range between loud and soft was so wide. An amplifier's ability to deliver a source's inner detail makes a big difference in how involving the sound is. The Powerpack 300 delivers all the subtleties of dialog and music with aplomb. On my own symphonic recordings, the Powerpack 300 had no trouble resolving the inner musical details of the first violins as well as the background sounds of the concert hall itself. The Bryston Powerpack 300 doesn't qualify as a romantic-sounding amplifier, but its upper frequencies have balanced neutrality that walks a fine line between brazen and reticent. Overly sibilant or peaky recordings and movies sound that way, while well-recorded sources come through without any additional euphony. Moving down into the midrange frequencies, the Bryston 300's harmonic presentation delivers little in the way of additional warmth or richness. Well-made recordings and soundtracks benefit from this harmonic presentation, while edgy or hard recordings don't. Compared with my current reference amplifiers, the Bel Canto EVO-2 and Pass Labs X-3, the Bryston Powerpack 300 has no more electronic noise, but it does have slightly more electronic grain. This ever-so-slightly grainy quality can be heard in the spaces and inner texture on recordings, and it accounts for some of the Powerpack 300s more matter-of-fact sonic character. Bass rendition down to 50 Hz (where my subwoofers take over) had excellent definition and detail with ample dynamic punch and authority. But since the amp doesn't add any extra harmonic character or complexity to sources, less-than-ideal recordings and movies can sound a bit lean in their lower frequencies. This leanness also makes it more challenging to mate a set of Powerpack 300s with excessively warm subwoofers. The Lexicon MC-12 EQ program solved this mating issue elegantly, but lesser processors don't have this EQ option. A first-class subwoofer, like the Earthquake SuperNova 15 MK-IV, blended easily with the Powerpack 300s, but a looser, less precise subwoofer might be a more challenging fit. The Powerpack 300's ability to re-create three dimensionality or depth seemed limited to recordings that have extremely convincing depth cues. On most recordings and soundtracks, the Powerpack 300's lateral imaging was precise, but its three-dimensional imaging was not as definitive or specific as with some amplifiers I've experienced, such as the Pass X-150 or Bel Canto EVO-2. Both the Bel Canto EVO-2 and Pass Labs X-3 possess noticeably warmer, more euphonic harmonic presentations that deliver a more tube-like, slightly less-electronic sonic picture. They also have more liquid midranges with lower levels of electronic noise and inner grain. While they both are approximately the same price per channel (if you use the EVO-2 as a 2-channel amp) they are much larger physically. The EVO-2 runs very cool and can be placed in fairly tight spaces, but the Pass needs good air circulation. The ergonomically elegant Powerpack 300 fits into many situations where neither of these two fine amplifiers could work as comfortably.
A 300-to-1 Shot
Highs and Lows
Highs
Lows
Article Continues: Specifications »
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
